Heape

People v. Heape

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 368·72 Cal. App. 226·237 P. 66
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1925Docket No. 1192.California4,067 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

Defendant was charged with the larceny of $250, the property of one Bruce G. Kingsley. He was found guilty as charged, and now appeals from the judgment of conviction.

A general outline of the case, as shown by the People’s witnesses, sufficient for an understanding of the points to be discussed, may be stated thus: On October 3, 1923, Kingsley and the defendant—the latter assuming to act in the name of and for and on behalf of a- fictitious corporation designated as the Great Western Builders Inc.—executed a written contract whereby Kingsley agreed to pay $1,000 to the mythical corporation, and that supposititious entity, according to the letter of the contract, agreed (1) to apply the $1,000 to the purchase of a certain lot in the city of Los Angeles and to build a bungalow thereon for Kingsley; (2) to arrange for all such financial aid as might be necessary to carry out the agreement; (3) to complete the building within ninety days, and (4) to secure for Kingsley, within such ninety-day period, a purchaser of the lot with tlie building thereon who would buy the premises at a price that would net Kingsley a profit of $1,000. There was either no such corporation as the Great…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.