Havens

Havens v. Loebel

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 294·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 861·284 P. 717
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 20, 1930Docket No. 3951.California873 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

This is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff Leila Havens, by reason of the alleged negligent operation of an automobile by the defendant. Also to recover for loss of services and damages to the automobile belonging to the plaintiff, R. F. Havens. The plaintiffs had judgment and the defendant appeals.

This action is based upon the collision of the automobile owned by B. F. Havens, with the defendant A. Loebel, mentioned and considered in the action of R. F. Havens against A. Loebel (Civil No. 3950), ante, p. 209 [ 284 Pac. 676 ], heretofore decided by this court in an opinion filed on the sixteenth day of January, 1930. The testimony in the instant case is practically the same as in the case of Havens v. Loebel, so far as it relates to all the conditions and circumstances attending the collision between the two automobiles. In addition to the testimony of the plaintiff there set forth and the statements in the opinion in that case as to what the testimony of the plaintiff established in relation to the plaintiff driving into the intersection with his sight so blinded or interrupted by the rays of the sun that he could not and did not see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.