Howard

Howard v. Worthington

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 807·50 Cal. App. 556·195 P. 709
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1920Civ. No. 3432.California1,755 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

In this action plaintiffs' seek to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by the plaintiff Howard by reason of alleged negligence in the operation of an automobile of the defendant. Additional damages are claimed for injuries to the plaintiff Howard’s automobile. The injuries complained of were the result of a collision between the automobile of the plaintiff Howard and the automobile of the defendant. The collision occurred at the intersection of Brand Boulevard and West Sixth Street, in the city of Glendale, while the plaintiff was driving his automobile southerly on Brand Boulevard and while the defendant’s automobile, driven by his employee, one Lucas, was traveling westerly on Sixth Street. The defendant by his answer denied the negligent operation of his own automobile, and alleged that at said time and place the plaintiff Howard was himself negligent and that the injuries complained of by him, if any,, were directly and proximately caused solely by the negligence of said Howard. In accordance with the jury’s verdict, judgment was entered in favor of the defendant, from which judgment the plaintiffs appeal.

The errors claimed and relied upon by appellants consist in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.