McCord

McCord v. Martin

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 498·47 Cal. App. 717·191 P. 89
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 1920Civ. No. 2159.California3,776 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

The action was begun in the superior court of the county of Santa Clara on the 22d of December, 1913. On the eighth day of October, 1914, an amendment to the complaint was filed to which the defendant, William Lindemann, filed a demurrer. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend on the twenty-eighth day of December, 1914, and thereafter, on the eighteenth day of January, 1915, judgment was entered in favor of defendant, Lindemann. An appeal from such judgment was thereafter taken by the plaintiffs, and the judgment was reversed by the district court of appeal of the first district. (McCord v. Martin, 34 Cal. App. 129 , [ 166 Pac. 1014 ].) The remittitur was filed in the court below on the sixth day of August, 1917, and thereafter an order was made by said superior court that the defendant answer within ten days after notice of said order. Within time the answer was filed, and thereafter, on motion of plaintiffs the action was transferred for trial to the superior court of Kings County. On January 15, 1918, the plaintiffs gave notice of a motion to strike out portions of the answer of defendant Lindemann, including paragraph 16 thereof, which set up as res judicata a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.