Newman

Newman v. Newby

Good Law
64 Cal. App. 279·221 P. 386
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1923Civ. No. 4429.California1,335 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover a judgment for a balance of $350 alleged to be due on a stated account; the defendant appeared and answered. In his answer he denied the mate rial allegations of the complaint and pleaded counterclaims and offsets. The trial court made findings in which it found that all of the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint are true, and that the denial and allegations in the defendant’s answer are not true. The defendant moved for a new trial, his motion was denied, and thereafter the defendant appealed under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

In his brief the appellant contends that no account stated was proved, and that the counterclaims set forth in the defendant’s answer should have been allowed. Both of these points involve the sufficiency of the evidence. In the record there is evidence showing that prior to the month of July, 1919, the defendant was an attorney at law practicing his profession and engaged in some other lines of business. That some months prior to that date the plaintiff, an unmarried woman of the age of seventy years, or thereabouts, commenced her dealings with the defendant. She accepted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.