Schaad

Schaad v. Barceloux

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 684·42 Cal. App. 337·183 P. 716
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 1919Civ. No. 1828.California5,397 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

The original complaint in the action had for its object to recover the value of certain five thou sand shares of the capital stock of the Glenn County Telephone Company, evidenced by certificate No. 12, of which plaintiff claimed to be the owner on March 14, 1908. Subsequently to the filing of the original complaint, plaintiff filed an amended complaint alleging that defendant had converted said shares, and praying for the judgment of the court that said shares be returned to plaintiff or that defendant pay the value thereof. Defendant filed a motion to strike out portions of the first amended complaint for the following reasons: “1. That no order was had or obtained for the filing of said first amended complaint; or if an order was had or obtained for the filing of said amended complaint, the same was not filed within the time allowed by law or by the court; 2. That said amended complaint changes the original cause of action, from an action in contract to an action in tort, and that said first amended complaint is not germane to the issues as framed by the original pleadings, and introduces a different cause of action.”

It was alleged in the original complaint that on March 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.