Hansen

Hansen v. Hansen & Johnson, Contractors, Inc.

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 934·92 Cal. App. 302·267 P. 1091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1928Docket No. 5624.California2,172 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants as executors of the last will of Peter H. Johnson, deceased, in an action to recover $2,000 claimed to be due as a result of a real estate transaction had between plaintiff and Johnson. Respondents urged as defenses a denial of liability and the statute of limitations, and they also set forth two counterclaims. The trial court found against appellant on the merits of his action and held that the same was barred by the statute of limitations, and found against respondents on the merits of their counterclaims.

The controversy grew out of the following facts, which are without substantial dispute: Johnson, the deceased, and Hansen, were engaged in the contracting business under the corporate name of Hansen & Johnson, Contractors, Inc., and during their operations acquired considerable encumbered property. Hansen became indebted to Johnson on account of advances made by the latter from time to time in order to carry on the business, and the parties eventually decided to adjust their financial affairs and divide up the property. Accordingly, on February 25, 1915, pursuant to the terms of a written agreement which they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.