Samuels

Samuels v. Larrimore

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 337·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 148·104 P. 1001
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 1909Civ. Nos. 647, 648.California839 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

two appeals are in separate records, but they will be considered together, as one is an appeal by defendant from the judgment against him, and the other from the order denying his motion for a new trial, and the questions are all considered together in the briefs filed by counsel.

The complaint is as follows: “That within two years last past said defendant became indebted to one Frank A. Whitman, in the sum of $635.86 for so much money loaned and advanced to said defendant by said Whitman at various times during said period at the special instance and request of said defendant. That prior to the commencement of this action said Whitman assigned, transferred and set over unto plaintiff said claim, demand and cause of action against said defendant. That no part of said indebtedness has been paid, and that there is now due, owing and payable by said defendant to said plaintiff on account of said indebtedness said sum of $635.86, together with interest thereon at the legal rates from the date of such loans and advances.”

The complaint concludes with the usual prayer for judgment for the amount claimed.

The first contention of appellant is that the court erred in overruling his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.