Matteson

Matteson v. McCarty

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 609·98 Cal. App. 45·276 P. 414
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 29, 1929Docket No. 3709.California1,168 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moncur, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that respondents are the' owners and entitled to the possession of certain real property described in the complaint herein. There is no substantial controversy as to the facts.

The action was commenced on the third day of June, 1926. It appears that on and prior to the twentieth day of July, 1917, Lewis W. Mustoe and Polly J. Mustoe were the owners of certain described real property in the county of Stanislaus, state of California, bounded and particularly described as follows, to wit:

On said day said Lewis W. Mustoe and Polly J. Mustoe executed a conveyance to Charles Lampley, appellants’ predecessor in interest, describing the lands hereinbefore specifically described, excepting particularly as follows:

This conveyance was recorded July 23, 1917, in the office of the recorder of Stanislaus County. On. July 25, 1917, said Lewis W. Mustoe and Polly J. Mustoe executed a conveyance to G. E. Brinkerhoff, respondents’ predecessor in interest, the description therein material to this decision, being as follows:

This conveyance was recorded on the twenty-seventh day of July, 1917, in said recorder’s office. As shown by the evidence, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.