Meserve

Imperial Water Co. No. 4 v. Meserve

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 413·62 Cal. App. 603·217 P. 553
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1923Civ. No. 3811.California2,122 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finlayson, J.

The defendants Edwin A. Meserve and Harry W. Meserve have appealed from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action brought by it against appellants and one D. L. Smith to recover a sum alleged to be due from the three defendants for water sold and delivered to them by plaintiff.

This is a companion case to Imperial Water Co. No. 4 v. Meserve, ante, p. 593 [ 217 Pac. 548 ]. The water for the price of which this action was brought was delivered to and used upon a tract of 320 acres of land owned by the defendant Edwin A. Meserve. The complaint, mutatis mit tandis, is similar to that which plaintiff filed in the companion case. In a broad, general way the facts are quite similar to those of the other case, with, however, certain important differences presently to be mentioned.

The defendant Edwin A. Meserve filed a cross-complaint wherein he alleges substantially the following: Plaintiff is a mutual water company org*anized for the purpose of delivering water to its stockholders at cost; “the waters hereinafter alleged and referred to are the same waters which plaintiff refers to in its complaint”; plaintiff negligently permitted its canals and distributing system to become…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.