Sohrokoff

Sohrokoff v. Zumwalt

Good Law
122 Cal. App. 768·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1211·10 P.2d 511
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1932Docket No. 4510.California2,009 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The complaint filed by the plaintiff in this action set forth two causes of actions: First: For a judgment on overcharges relative to certain dealings had by the plaintiff and his assignors with the defendant. Second: Judgment for damages by reason of being prevented by the defendant from threshing certain crops for which the plaintiff and his assignors had contracts. The plaintiff had judgment for overcharges against the defendant in the sum of $1705.43, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent per annum from December 23, 1926, the date of settlement between plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff was denied judgment on his second cause of action. From the judgment awarding damages, as above stated, against the defendant, the defendant appeals. From the judgment of the court denying the plaintiff relief under his second cause of action, the plaintiff appeals.

In addition to what we have stated, the plaintiff claims that there should be added to the judgment awarded him on his first cause of action the further sum of $500.

The record shows that the plaintiff and A. D. Melniboff, in their individual names, had a series of transactions with the defendant. In these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.