Creason

Creason v. Creason

Good Law
123 Cal. App. 455·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 1009·11 P.2d 451
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 1932Docket No. 8185.California1,418 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ward, J.

— Plaintiffs and defendants are the children of W. J. Creason, deceased. On August 17, 1925, W. J. Creason, aged seventy-six years, shortly after becoming blind made and executed a certain deed and entered into an escrow agreement with one J. P. Mandl that upon the death of the grantor the deed should be delivered to defendant Prank L. Creason.

The first cause of action in the complaint is in the nature of quiet title. The second cause of action and the answer thereto raise issues of incompetency, undue influence, confidential relations, independent advice and want of consideration upon the alleged promise of defendant to take and hold the deed in trust during the life of decedent for his benefit, and after his death to share the property equally with the other heirs. The trial court found for the defendants, Frank L. Creason, the grantee, and Edith Whitaker, a daughter, who filed a disclaimer. From the judgment rendered, plaintiffs appealed.

In appellants’ reply brief, attention is confined to the “three material arguments ... in our opening brief”. The three points referred to are that the grantor was mentally incompetent, that the grantor did not intend the deed of August 17,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.