Milekovich

Milekovich v. Quinn

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 150·40 Cal. App. 537·181 P. 256
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 1919Civ. No. 2709.California4,654 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

Plaintiff and respondent in her suit sought to be relieved of that portion of a prior decree of divorce by which the property rights of the partiesi to the divorce suit are claimed by the appellants to have been finally adjudicated. The essential facts are admitted. In the interim between the divorce decree and the commencement of this action the plaintiff had remarried. When the divorce action was brought, a restraining order was made on the ex parte application of the plaintiff prohibiting the defendant in the divorce action, Patrick P. Quinn, from disposing of any portion of the community property. On the following day, Quinn, upon an ex parte application, caused the restraining order to be set aside. Immediately thereafter he withdrew from his safe deposit box bonds of the par value of forty-five thousand dollars and delivered them to one Brady for the purpose of secreting-them from the knowledge of Mrs. Quinn, her attorneys, and the court in which the divorce action was pending.

In her complaint for divorce the plaintiff made allegations concerning the community property and among other things, upon information and belief, that the defendant had securities of the value of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.