Margolis

Margolis v. Leonard & Holt

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 399·94 Cal. App. 716·271 P. 758
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1928Docket No. 6566.California1,172 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dooling, J.

Plaintiff, who had been employed by defendant as a real estate salesman, brought this action to secure an accounting from defendant of the amount which had become due to him for sales of real estate made by him while he was in defendant’s employ. The action was commenced on July 15, 1925, but by stipulation of the parties entered into during the trial the accounting was had to October 1st of that year.

Under plaintiff’s contract with defendant his commissions did not accrue until the money from the sale of the properties was actually collected by defendant and the accounting was asked for because the record of those collections was in the possession of defendant and not available to the plaintiff. At the conclusion of the trial, in which evidence, much of it conflicting, was introduced covering a large number of transactions, the court ordered judgment for plaintiff for $3,000. From the judgment which followed plaintiff has presented this appeal.

The trial court made a general finding that “from the period of March 18, 1924, to October 1, 1925, the defendant received commissions from various sales negotiated and consummated by the plaintiff, and that the portion or share of said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.