Carr

Pacific Railways Advertising Co. v. Carr

Good Law
1916 Cal. App. LEXIS 148·29 Cal. App. 722·157 P. 529
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1916Civ. No. 1689.California876 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Action to recover upon a promissory note made by defendant to plaintiff. The case was tried before a jury, which brought in a verdict for defendant. .Judgment followed in accordance therewith.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of court denying its motion for a new trial. While admitting the making of the note and nonpayment thereof, defendant insists there was no consideration for its execution. The note was given in renewal of one theretofore executed by defendant to plaintiff under the following circumstances: Under a purported contract made by plaintiff with a corporation known as the Amritam Company there was, on August 21, 1912, claimed to be due to plaintiff from the latter company the sum of $442. This contract was executed on, behalf of the Amritam Company, without the corporate seal affixed thereto, by J. S. Benner, secretary and treasurer thereof. No authority was ever conferred upon him to execute such contract; nor was ■ there any ratification thereof. After the alleged liability had been so incurred, defendant acquired an interest in the Amritam Company, and upon being informed by said Benner, secretary of the company, that the contract constituted a binding obligation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.