Connolly

Connolly v. Lake County Canning Co.

Good Law
95 Cal. App. 768·273 P. 611
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1928Docket No. 6389.California1,245 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Knight, J.

Appellant, as the owner of an undivided one-fifteenth interest in an acre of land in Mendocino County, brought this suit to quiet title thereto, and to require respondents, who were occupying said land, to account for the proceeds derived from its use. Respondents filed a cross-complaint for specific performance, alleging in substance that during the year 1916 respondent Lake County Canning Company entered into possession of said land under a written lease granted by plaintiff and his co-owners, and by the same instrument was given an option to purchase the land at any time prior to April 1, 1919; that the exercise of the option was delayed by the acts of the appellant until April 10, 1919, at which time said Canning Company tendered appellant his share of the purchase price, amounting to $233.19, and demanded a deed; and that appellant refused to accept the money or to execute the deed. The trial court found generally in accordance with the facts alleged in the cross-complaint, and from the judgment entered on said findings this appeal is taken.

Appellant devotes much space in his brief to the citation of authorities holding generally that time is of the essence of an option to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.