Ross

Ross v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 581·56 Cal. App. 254·205 P. 43
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 24, 1922Civ. No. 3973.California1,465 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s second amended complaint without leave to amend. The action is one in form to recover damages against the defendant Mark Lane as a notary public and against the defendant New Amsterdam Casualty Company, a corporation, as the surety upon his official bond, in the sum of $650 alleged to have been sustained through the official misconduct and negligence of said defendant Mark Lane as a notary public in the course of the following transaction as set forth in the plaintiff’s second amended complaint substantially as follows: On or about November 6, 1919, the plaintiff paid to one Gladys Steele the sum of $650 as the purchase price of an automobile represented by said Gladys Steele to belong to her and to have been purchased by her from one John Reed; and the said Gladys Steele, as an inducement to the plaintiff to buy said automobile, presented to plaintiff a bill of sale which she represented she had received from said John Reed, which bill of sale was in the usual form of such documents, but which had attached to it a certificate of acknowledgment in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.