Main

City & County of San Francisco v. Main

Good Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 181·23 Cal. App. 86·137 P. 281
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1913Civ. No. 486.California1,607 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an action brought by the city and county of San Francisco to quiet title to a tract of land lying in what was formerly the bed of Mission Creek, between Tenth and Eleventh streets, and forming a part of the southern boundary of the lands of the appellant herein.

The defendant, Charles Main, permitted judgment to go against him by default; but the defendant, "Flora B. MacDermott, appeared, and filed her answer and cross-complaint, wherein she averred that she was entitled to an easement over the lands in question based upon two distinct claims of right, the first being that Mission Creek was and continued to be a navigable stream until a time after the date when her predecessors acquired title to the lands she now owns from the plaintiff herein; and the other claim being that after Mission Creek ceased to be navigable it became, and for some years continued to be, a public street known as Channel Street; that while thus open as a public street the predecessors in interest of the appellant had the right of ingress and egress to and. from the land she now owns along and upon it; and that the said street having been closed without her consent and without payment of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.