Berman

From the petition of the applicant herein for a writ of review it appears that while acting in the course of his employment he suffered an injury in that he was overcome by carbon monoxide gas. For a period covering several months after he sustained the injury, petitioner suffered from some sort of illness, and the ultimate question submitted to the respondent Industrial Accident Commission was whether .or not such illness was proximately caused by the injury of which petitioner complained.

The findings by the Commission regarding the matter were that: “The disability from which the employee was found to be suffering after the expiration of seven days from the date of said injury was caused by a disease or condition and not to any injury or injuries arising out of said employment, nor proximately caused by said employment.”

The only question which this court may decide in this proceeding is whether or not there was sufficient evidence to support such finding. (Puitt v. Industrial Accident Commission, 189 Cal. 459 [ 209 Pac. 31 ] ; Walker v. Industrial Accident Commission, 177 Cal. 737 [L. R. A. 1918F, 212, 171 Pac. 954 ]; Roebling’s Sons Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission, 36…