Correa

Correa v. Davis

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 136·69 Cal. App. 180·230 P. 984
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 11, 1924Civ. No. 4940.California1,307 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant to recover a judgment for damages by reason of injuries suffered in a collision between" his automobile and an interurban train operated by the defendant. The case was tried before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and entered a judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. From that judgment the defendant has appealed and has brought up the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The accident occurred near Melrose station on the Southern Pacific right of way in Alameda County on the twenty-seventh day of February, 1920. The plaintiff, accompanied by a young lady, was driving on East Fourteenth Street westerly toward the city of Oakland. As he approached the crossing of that street with Forty-seventh' Avenue one of the trains of the defendant was standing at the station. As a witness in his own behalf the plaintiff testified that the train was an interurban electric train and that it was equipped with apparatus that from the casual inspection of a passer-by it could not be ascertained whether the train was to move north or to move south. He said that he had been and was engaged in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.