Neudeck

Neudeck v. Vestal

Good Law
117 Cal. App. 266·3 P.2d 595
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1931Docket No. 7581.California1,171 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

On June 16, 1927, June A. Neudeck, a minor, fell and broke her right arm. The child was immediately taken to a hospital, and defendant, a duly licensed physician, was called to treat her. An X-ray photograph was made and the bone set, following which the arm was placed in a plaster cast. Defendant continued to treat the child until July 1, 1927, when he was discharged.

Two actions were filed against him, one by the minor, through her guardian, for damages caused by his alleged negligence in treating the arm, and the other by the child’s father to recover the expenses subsequently incurred for medical services which the alleged negligence made necessary. The actions were tried together by a jury, which returned a verdict for the defendant in each case, and appeals were taken by the plaintiffs from the judgments entered thereon. As grounds' therefor it is contended that the trial court at defendant’s request gave certain instructions which were prejudicially erroneous.

Two of the instructions complained of were as follows: “You are instructed that a physician or surgeon en titled to practice his profession, possessing the requisite qualifications and applying Ms skill and judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.