Lewis

Lewis v. Southern California Edison Co.

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 44·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 342·2 P.2d 419
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 1931Docket No. 861.California3,568 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Griffin, J.

The above-entitled action, Luvada, R. Lewis v. Southern California Edison Company and Harry Plotz, was an action brought by appellants for the wrongful death of Henry E. Lewis, husband of Luvada R. Lewis and father of Mary Lewis. The action entitled ‘ ‘ City of Los Angeles v. Southern California Edison Company and Harry Plotz” was an action brought by the City of Los Angeles against respondents under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law to recover a lien on any judgment rendered in favor of appellants Luvada R. Lewis and Mary Lewis by reason of an award granted under the Workmen’s Compensation Law because of the death of deceased in the course of his employment by the City of Los Angeles. The two actions were consolidated for trial in the superior court and a stipulation was entered into by and between the respective parties hereto that the same be consolidated on appeal.

On the twenty-fifth day of February, 1927, the deceased, Henry E. Lewis, was employed by the engineering department of the City of Los Angeles as a swamper on a certain garbage truck being operated in a northerly direction on North Doheny Drive in the City of Los Angeles. In the performance of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.