Cusick

People v. Cusick

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 188·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 182·104 P. 461
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1909Crim. No. 93.California485 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The defendant was informed against by the district attorney of Tuba county for the crime of criminal libel alleged to have been committed upon one W. C. Wilkins. A demurrer upon the ground that the facts stated in the information do not constitute a public offense and that said information “does not substantially or at all conform to the requirements of sections 950, 951 and 952 of the Penal Code” was sustained by the trial court, and the defendant ordered discharged and his bondsmen released.

It is from the judgment upon the demurrer that this appeal is taken by the people.

Upon the oral argument of the cause before this court, the point was made for the first time that, as the bill of exceptions does not contain the information and the grounds of the demurrer, the ruling of the court below cannot be reviewed.

The transcript contains the information, the demurrer, minutes of the arraignment and a purported bill of exceptions which, as respondent declares, does not embrace either the information or the demurrer or the grounds thereof. We are therefore without any properly authenticated record from which we can determine whether the court erred in its ruling on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.