Prince

Prince v. Selby Smelting Lead Co.

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 442·35 Cal. App. 684·170 P. 1075
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1917Civ. No. 2247.California1,414 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

This is an action by plaintiff, as a real estate broker, to recover commission alleged to be due him for effecting a sale of real estate belonging to the defendant.

There is no dispute as to the facts, and the proposition of law involved is simple. The following is a brief synopsis of the steps in the transaction: On May 28, 1914, the defendant gave to the plaintiff a letter which in effect provided that if certain options theretofore given to plaintiff by the defendant, and which by their terms expired on June 15, 1914, were accepted, plaintiff should be allowed five per cent commission, of which, should the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars be received by defendant, on account of a sale of the land made pursuant to said option, on or before June 15, 1914, one thousand five hundred dollars should be paid to plaintiff on account of said commission. On June 8, 1914, the defendant entered into a contract with A. D. Bowen, a prospective purchaser introduced by the plaintiff, for the purchase of the property involved, which contract departed from the terms of said options and stipulated that the total purchase price should be sixty-three thousand five hundred dollars,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.