In Re Thomas

A proceeding was commenced before the Board of Osteopathic Examiners to obtain a judgment revoking the certificate and license of the petitioner authorizing him to practice osteopathy. It was alleged that the petitioner had violated the provisions of subdivision 12, section 14, chapter 354, of the Statutes of 1913. Thereafter the Board of Osteopathic Examiners held a trial. Evidence, both oral and documentary, was introduced and the matter was submitted to the board for its determination. The board made findings against this petitioner and caused to be entered in its records an order revoking the license of the petitioner. Thereafter the petitioner applied to the superior court for a writ of review. An alternative writ *Page 496 was issued and thereafter a full hearing was had on said application. The trial court denied the petitioner a peremptory writ and affirmed the proceedings had before the Board of Osteopathic Examiners. From the judgment of the trial court the petitioner has appealed. [1] In his brief he has set forth apparently a transcript of the proceedings had before the Board of Osteopathic Examiners. Having done so he argues that the evidence is not such testimony as…