Russell

Russell v. Roscoe

Good Law
106 Cal. App. 293·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 529·289 P. 185
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 7, 1930Docket No. 221.California2,184 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cary, J.

At the times under consideration here plaintiff was an inventor and the owner of a patent on a parachute. Defendant owned an interest in the Melrose Confectionery Company. Plaintiff, lacking both the business experience and the means to place his invention on the market, met defendant, who undertook, in consideration of receiving an interest in the patent, to find a party who could supply the experience and the means for marketing the same. The agreements between plaintiff and defendant include a total of six contracts. In due course these contracts produced two lawsuits, which were consolidated for trial purposes, resulted in judgments for plaintiff, are here presented on a single record and are now to be considered.

The plaintiff in the first action seeks cancellation of three contracts on the ground of failure of consideration. Contract No. 1, dated September 23, 1925, provides that plaintiff is to assign his interest in the patent to a corporation thereafter to be organized, provides for the division of the stock among the parties, that plaintiff is to devote all of his time to the interests of the corporation and that defendant and one Browne (the latter not being involved…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.