Hebert

Hebert v. Byron Jackson Iron Works

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 610·39 Cal. App. 209·178 P. 550
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 19, 1918Civ. No. 2609.California2,400 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

James, J.

Appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by reason of the death of the husband of Laura Hebert, which in the complaint, it was asserted, was caused by the negligent omission of the defendant to supply safe means and utensils to its servant, who was killed. The accident, which caused the death of Roy L. Hebert, occurred while deceased was in the employ of the defendant and engaged in the work of installing a pump in a well-pit. A bucket attached to a hoist was being used to lower men and material into the well, and while Hebert and another man were in the act of being lowered on the bucket into the pit, the bucket became detached from the hoist and fell to the bottom of the well. Both men were billed. This action was first commenced with Laura Hebert and Eloi Hebert as plaintiffs. Eloi Hebert was the father of the deceased. After evidence had been introduced on behalf of the plaintiffs, defendant made a motion for judgment of nonsuit, one of the grounds of said motion being that plaintiffs were not proper-parties and that there was a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.