MacKenzie

MacKenzie v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings Bank

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 64·39 Cal. App. 247·178 P. 557
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 1918Civ. No. 2604.California2,233 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

James, J.

This action was brought for the purpose of securing a decree declaring void a trust created by William Mackenzie, deceased. Defendant Trust & Savings Bank was named as the trustee in the instrument of trust executed by said Mackenzie. It was also administrator of his estate. From the judgment denying the plaintiff the relief sought, this appeal was taken.

The facts were agreed upon and presented to the trial judge by written stipulation. It appears that in 1904 William Mackenzie, being the owner of a large amount of property, determined that he would then distribute to his wife and children such proportions thereof as he desired them to have, rather than to leave such distribution to be made by will. Besides his wife, there were then living this plaintiff, a daughter, who was unmarried and then and since residing at Glen Cove, New York; William Mackenzie, his son; Teanie Covey, a married daughter, and Sophia Mackenzie, an unmarried daughter. There were nine grandchildren, six being the children of the son, William Mackenzie, and three the children, of Mrs. Covey. In that year he made distribution to his wife and children, all of whom accepted the property given to them and all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.