Murphy v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 228·2 Cal. App. 468·83 P. 577
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1905Civ. No. 107.California724 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Cooper, J.

Application for writ of mandate to compel the defendant, board of police pension fund commissioners, to order and direct that a monthly pension of $50 per month be paid to plaintiff from the date of the death of her deceased husband, Joseph F. Murphy, as long as she shall remain unmarried. The case was tried in the court below upon issues raised by the answer, and findings were filed, upon which judgment was ordered and entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the order denying the plaintiff’s motion.

Error is claimed in respect to the rulings of the court in sustaining two objections to questions asked by plaintiff of her own witnesses during the trial. The theory and claim of plaintiff was that her deceased husband was killed while in the actual performance of his duties as a member of the police department, by receiving severe internal injuries while arresting an offender against the laws. Harry Seguin, a witness called by plaintiff, testified that he was standing near Ninth street when he heard the call of a police whistle; that he walked down Harrison street, past Eighth street, past Chesley street,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.