Powell

People v. Powell

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 581·71 Cal. App. 500·236 P. 311
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1925Docket No. 814.California5,586 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hart, J.

defendants were jointly charged with and tried for and convicted of the crime of criminal syndicalism in the superior court of Plumboldt County. Each made a motion for a new trial and the same was denied and each appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial.

The offense with which the accused are charged and of which they were convicted is that so denounced by subdivision 4 of section 2 of the Criminal Syndicalism Act (Stats. 1919, p. 281), which makes it a felony for any person to inaugurate or assist in inaugurating, or is or knowingly becomes a member of, any organization, society, group, or assemblage of persons, organized or assembled to advocate, teach, or aid and abet criminal syndicalism, as that crime is defined by section 1 of that act.

Seven of the defendants were, on the fourteenth day of October, 1923, arrested by the sheriff of Humboldt County, assisted by several deputies, in a room in a building designated and known as “218 D Street,” in the city of Eureka, in said county. The defendants so arrested were Powell, Bryan, McRae, Allen, French, Taylor, and Beavert. The defendant Nicholson was arrested at a subsequent time at some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.