Beecham

Beecham v. Burns

Good Law
1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 189·34 Cal. App. 754·168 P. 1058
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1917Civ. No. 2387.California2,429 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

The record on appeal in this case consists of a typewritten “Clerk’s Transcript on Appeal” and a typewritten “Reporter’s Transcript on Appeal” prepared in the manner prescribed by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Upon such a record it is. required that the parties “print in their briefs, or in a supplement appended thereto, such portions of the record as they desire to call to the attention of the court.” (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 953c.)

The brief for appellant opens with the statement that this is an action to compel appellant, as city clerk of the city of Venice, to certify to the sufficiency of a certain petition for the recall of J. J. Lewis, one of the city trustees of the city of Venice. Appellant has not printed in or with his brief any part of the judgment-roll, but has given us a statement in the language of his counsel narrating facts which he says were found by the court. No part of the alleged findings has been printed, except copies of three documents which, according to the brief, the court found had been filed with the board of trustees of the city by the city clerk, all relating to the proposed recall of trustee Lewis. So, also, referring to some portions…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.