Medley

Medley v. Hill

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 309·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 1032·285 P. 891
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1930Docket No. 84.California986 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Barnard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal, made and entered after a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint had been sustained, without leave to amend.

The action was one against the sheriff of the county of Tulare, seeking to recover certain damages, together with the statutory penalty provided for in section 693 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for the alleged negligence of the defendant sheriff in failing to give proper notice of sale, as required by section 692 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in connection with the sale of certain lots previously sold under a writ of execution and purchased by this plaintiff. The plaintiff alleges that he brought a quiet title action after purchasing the lots, in which a judgment was rendered declaring the description used by the sheriff, in the aforesaid notice of sale, to be wholly inadequate and insufficient to identify the lots, and adjudging that the plaintiff received no title under the sheriff’s deed. It appears that the notice of the execution sale, containing the insufficient description, was posted on October 3, 1923; that the plaintiff bought in the real property and received a certificate of sale from the sheriff on October 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.