Upjohn

Austin v. Upjohn

Good Law
130 Cal. App. 733·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1035·20 P.2d 735
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 31, 1933Docket No. 7746.California497 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

A contract with Pacific Electric Railway Company, a corporation, was entered into by Pasadena City High School District for the transportation of school children. The facts are fully set out in Pasadena City High School Dist. v. Upjohn, 206 Cal. 775 [ 276 Pac. 341, 343 , 63 A. L. R. 408], and the requisition for compensation under such contract was regularly approved and presented to the County Superintendent of Schools and the County Auditor refused to honor it in part. Some time after the contract had expired the district requested the county counsel to institute mandamus proceedings against the two county officers referred to, to compel them to honor the requisition. The county counsel refused and the district employed plaintiff’s assignors to act as attorneys in the prosecution of such a proceeding. The district thereafter, in conjunction with the railway company, instituted and prosecuted such proceedings to a conclusion. (Pasadena City High School Dist. v. Upjohn, supra.) Thereafter an attorney’s fee for such service was approved by the district, but the said referred to county officers refused to honor it and a proceeding in mandamus was instituted and prosecuted in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.