Lalor

People v. Lalor

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 467·95 Cal. App. 242·272 P. 794
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1928Docket No. 1499.California1,868 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The district attorney filed an information against the defendant charging him with having committed grand theft. The defendant appeared, pleaded not guilty, and a trial was had before the trial court sitting with a jury; the jury returned a verdict of guilty, the defendant made a motion in arrest of judgment, the motion was denied; the defendant made a motion for a new trial, the motion was denied, and the defendant has appealed from the orders and the judgment.

The defendant contends that the information does not state a public offense. The charging part of the information is as follows: “The district attorney for the county of Fresno, state of California, hereby accuses Steve Lalor of the crime of a felony, to wit: grand theft, in that the said Steve Lalor on or about the 9th day of November, 1927, at and in the said county of Fresno, and state of California, unlawfully took the property of one Margaret J. Adams, consisting of 400 shares of the stock of the ‘Great Republic Life Insurance Company7 of a value in excess of $200, lawful money of the United States.” If we omit the words “consisting of 400 shares of the stock of the Great Republic Life Insurance Company,77 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.