Tunnicliff

Tunnicliff v. Holmes

Good Law
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 248·69 Cal. App. 702·232 P. 148
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 20, 1924Civ. No. 4959.California678 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an order of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco denying defendant’s motion for a change of venue.

The action was commenced in the city and county of San Francisco. Defendant filed a demurrer, notice of motion to change the place of trial, written demand for change of place of trial, and affidavit supporting the same. The notice of the said motion stated that said motion “will be made upon the affidavit of Goldie May Holmes, the written demand of Goldie May Holmes for change of venue (copy of which is annexed hereto, and is herewith served upon you), and upon the papers on file in said action; said motion will be made upon the following grounds, to-wit: That at the time of the commencement of said action, the defendant was not a resident of San Francisco County, California, but that she was a resident of San Bernardino County, California, and that the county of San Bernardino, California, is the proper county for a trial of said action.”

The affidavit of defendant was to the effect that she had been a resident of San Bernardino County, California, for more than a year last past, and that at the time of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.