Fisher

Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.

Good Law
12 Cal. App. 299·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 9·107 P. 332
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1909Civ. No. 672.California2,847 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Chipman, J.

There are three different motions in this ease, each taking a separate number. Number 669 is a motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment on the ground that no transcript has been filed in time. The transcript, however, was filed agreeably to stipulation, which is a sufficient answer to the first motion. The second motion, number 671, is a motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal, taken July 29, 1907, from the order of the superior court, made May 31, 1907, denying appellant’s motion for a new trial made by it under the act of March 23, 1907 (Stats. 1907, p. 998), which second motion is, by stipulation, to be considered upon the following grounds: (1) That there exists no record upon which said appeal can be heard or considered; (2) that the papers used, and evidence taken on the hearing which resulted in said order are not, and never have been incorporated in a bill of exceptions. There is a further ground, stated in the notice of motion, to wit, that the proceedings taken by appellant for the settlement of a bill of exceptions were dismissed for want of prosecution February 19, 1909. The third motion, number 672, is from an order dismissing appellant’s appeal from the order of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.