Hornlein

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendants for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff upon the property of defendants J. H. Bohlig and Lotta Bohlig.

Bohlig, the sole owner of a portion of the real property subjected to the lien, entered into a contract with Hladik & Thayer, architects, whereby said architects agreed to furnish all plans, specifications, architectural- work, and superintendence employed in the construction of a building to be erected, and which was erected, upon Bohlig’s land and partly upon land owned by Bohlig and his wife, Lotta Bohlig. Thereafter plaintiff entered into a contract with Hladik & Thayer, whereby plaintiff agreed to furnish the engineering designs of the building for which he was to receive $620. The court found that plaintiff duly performed his part of the contract; that the engineering designs so furnished by plaintiff were actually used in the construction of the building; that defendants Hladik & Thayer paid on account the sum of $270, and that $350 remained unpaid. From these findings the court deduced the conclusion of law that plaintiff was entitled to judgment against defendants for the…