Stowell

Welfare Investment Co. v. Stowell

Good Law
132 Cal. App. 275·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 398·22 P.2d 529
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 26, 1933Docket No. 8996.California811 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

The plaintiff, as assignee of the payee, sued one of four comakers of a joint and several promissory note. The defendant answered, setting up special defenses of payment through allegations that the purported assignment to the plaintiff herein was made at the instance and request of one of the comakers of said promissory note; that the plaintiff herein is in fact the alter ego of said comaker ; that the obligation of the defendant to the payee upon said promissory note was in fact satisfied and discharged by the plaintiff herein; and that the purported assignment thereof to this plaintiff was made for the purpose of enforcing said obligation against this defendant alone and for releasing therefrom the other comakers of said note. At the time of filing the answer the defendant also filed a cross-complaint, bringing in as additional parties the three other comakers of the note and the payee named therein. Summons was issued and served upon these parties pursuant to an order of court duly made for that purpose. This cross-complaint pleaded in somewhat briefer detail the same issue raised in the answer and alleged that a controversy existed as to the legal rights and duties of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.