Baker

Baker v. Carstenbrook

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 232·78 Cal. App. 133·248 P. 295
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 24, 1926Docket No. 2928.California1,224 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Action for fraud and deceit in the sale of real estate. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appeals.

The record shows that on or about the twenty-eighth day of April, 1922, the appellant purported to convey and transfer to the plaintiff by a grant, bargain, and sale deed a certain tract of land situate, lying, and being in the city of Marysville, county of Yuba, state of California, described as follows: The east one-half (E. %) of block number fourteen (14), of range letter “K” of the said city of Marysville, as the lots, blocks, and ranges are laid down, numbered and designated upon the official recorded map of the said city of Marysville; that the appellant had at that time a certain tract of land inclosed by a fence which the defendant falsely represented to the plaintiff was the land described in the deed, the complaint further alleging that at the time of making such statements and representations the defendant knew the same to be false and that the false statements were made for the purpose of inducing the plaintiff to consummate the deal and enter into the possession of the premises inclosed by the fence hereinbefore referred to; that the defendant at that date was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.