Schroeder

Schroeder v. McCargar

Good Law
137 Cal. App. 320·1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 826·30 P.2d 543
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 12, 1934Docket No. 9391.California858 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Conrey, J.

Appellants having filed their brief containing a statement of their grounds of appeal, now come the respondents and move for dismissal of the appeal or affirmance of the judgment, upon the grounds that the appeal was taken for delay only, and that the questions on which the decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as not to need further argument. (Rule Y, sec. 3.) We shall decide the motion upon consideration of the second ground only.

The injuries of which the plaintiffs complained were received as the result of a collision between an automobile driven by the plaintiff Sehroeder, and another automobile driven by the defendant Self. Immediately preceding the collision the plaintiffs were traveling in a westerly direction on West Third Street in the city of Long Beach, and the defendants were going south on Daisy Avenue. The point of collision was at or near the west line of Daisy Avenue at some point between the north curb and the south curb of Third Street. The judgment was based upon findings that appellant Self was negligent in the operation of the automobile driven by him, and that the plaintiffs were free of contributory negligence. Summarized, in their essential…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.