Dinkelspiel

Dinkelspiel v. Nason

Good Law
17 Cal. App. 591·1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 26·120 P. 789
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1911Civ. No. 870.California2,979 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Burnett, J.

On July 28, 1904, plaintiff entered into a broker’s contract with defendants for the sale of certain real property. Plaintiff was authorized to sell the property for $30,000 or any less sum accepted by defendants, and he was to receive a commission of five per cent. This provision was also in the agreement: “We also agree to pay said Edward Dinkelspiel, in the event of the sale of said property by him, or by anyone else, including ourselves, while this agreement is in force five per cent as and for his compensation thereunder.” The contract was to continue until withdrawn by defendants in writing, and it was in force during all the time herein mentioned. On April 17, 1905, defendants leased the property to one William Pierce for the term of five years from April 1, 1905. The lease contained the following provision: “It is agreed that at any time during the said term, the said party of the second part (Pierce) may, at his option purchase from the said parties of the first part (defendants) the said premises for the sum of $18,000.00 in gold coin; and the said parties of the first part will, in consideration of the said $18,000.00, convey to the said party of the second part a good,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.