Spier

Spier v. Peck

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 332·36 Cal. App. 4·171 P. 115
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1918Civ. No. 2512.California2,015 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Works, J.

Petitioner is probation officer of the county of Ventura and is also acting under appointment as superintendent of the detention home for the same county, both of the offices, or positions, having their existence under what is known as the Juvenile Court Act (Stats. 1915, p. 1225, Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act No. 1770a). The law fixes petitioner’s salary as probation officer at one hundred dollars per month and as superintendent of the detention home at fifty dollars per month. Section 18 of the Juvenile Court Act provides, among other things, “All probation officers . . . receiving a salary of seventy-five dollars or more per month shall devote their entire time and attention to the duties of their, offices, and no such probation officer, . . . while holding such office and receiving salary therefor, shall be a candidate for or seek the nomination for any other public office or employment. ’ ’ The petitioner presented to the board of supervisors of the county his claim for salary for June, 1917, as superintendent of the detention home and the claim was allowed. The county auditor approved the demand and issued his warrant for its payment, but the respondent, who is the county…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.