Moore

Moore v. Levy

Good Law
128 Cal. App. 687·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1213·18 P.2d 362
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 14, 1933Docket Nos. 4642, 4643.California2,378 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Pullen, J.

The two eases entitled above, consolidated and tried together, were instituted to recover damages resulting from the collision of two automobiles. Respondent Victor A. Moore was the owner of one of the cars involved in the collision, which was at the time being driven by his wife, Catherine L. Moore, a respondent, and seated in the rear seat of the car was his niece, Gladys Moore. The ease was tried by the court sitting without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of Victor A. Moore in the sum of $517.69 for damages to. the automobile. Catherine L. Moore was awarded the sum of $2,654 on account of her personal injuries, and Gladys Moore was awarded $5,000 for the personal injuries she sustained.

Appellant maintains that the award of $5,000 to Gladys Moore and the damages awarded to Catherine L. Moore are excessive and the evidence is wholly insufficient to prove that the respective injuries complained of were the result of the accident, and that the amount awarded Victor A. Moore for damages to his automobile is excessive and not supported by the evidence; that the amended findings are insufficient to support the judgment, and lastly, that the court had no power under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.