Moran

People v. Moran

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 209·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 344·122 P. 969
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1912Crim. No. 365.California804 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hall, J.

Appellant was jointly charged with one Harold Jones with the crime of attempt to commit robbery, and was upon his trial found guilty as charged, and upon judgment being pronounced took an appeal from such judgment to this court.

The only point urged in the brief for a reversal is that the evidence does not show any overt act or attempt upon the part of appellant, but only acts of preparation. We think, however, that the evidence in the record does show something more than mere acts of preparation, and does show a sufficient overt act to constitute an attempt to commit robbery, within the rule as to attempts to commit crimes as laid down in People v. Stites, 75 Cal. 570 , [ 17 Pac. 693 ].

The evidence tends to show that either appellant or his co-defendant, at between 1 and 2 o’clock in the morning, pushed open the swinging doors of a saloon situate on Kentucky street, thrust his head within, and seeing that there were about twelve men in the saloon, withdrew and crossed the street and joined his codefendant. The two men walked away, but were immediately followed by an officer to whom they had been pointed out. The defendants were followed by the officer for about two blocks,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.