O'Neill

O'Neill v. Williams

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 385·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 386·15 P.2d 879
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1932Docket No. 8443.California1,501 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Spence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries. Upon a trial by jury she recovered judgment against defendants, from which judgment defendants appeal.

The undisputed facts having reference to the questions presented on this appeal may be briefly stated. Defendant Carl Williams and defendant Gladys Williams were husband and wife. The automobile involved belonged to the defendant Gladys Williams, having been acquired by her prior to her marriage to the defendant Carl Williams. At the time of the accident defendant Carl Williams was operating said automobile on a personal pleasure trip with the knowledge and permission of his wife. It is conceded that he was not accompanied by his wife and that he was not acting as the agent of or for the purposes of his wife in operating his automobile at the time. Judgment was entered against defendant Carl Williams in the sum of $12,500 and against the defendant Gladys Williams in the sum of $5,000, said last-named sum being the limit of liability herein of said defendant Gladys Williams as owner of the car under the provisions of section 1714]4 of the Civil Code.

The only questions raised on this appeal involve said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.