King

King v. Hercules Powder Co.

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 70·39 Cal. App. 223·178 P. 531
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 20, 1918Civ. No. 2592.California826 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment for a nonsuit. The action was brought for conversion of two Perdieron mares, and for injuries inflicted, resulting in the death of one and permanent damage to the other. The action was originally brought against the present defendant and against the Hercules Water Company, J. O’Neill, J. Fassler, and certain fictitious defendants. None of the defendants, other than the Hercules Powder Company, were ever served, and at the time of the trial, plaintiff dismissed as to all the other defendants. The defendant, Hercules Powder Company, filed an answer denying that it had ever taken and used the mares, or in any way injured them. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved for a non-suit, which motion was denied. After all the evidence was in, the defendant again moved for a nonsuit, which was this time granted on the ground that if the horses were used, they were used by one O’Neill, or his agents, and that O’Neill was an independent contractor.

The appellant contends that the case should have been submitted to the jury, and that the granting of the nonsuit was error. We think the motion was properly granted. It is settled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.