Wagner

Wagner v. Meinzer

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 143·38 Cal. App. 670·177 P. 293
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1918Civ. No. 2521.California476 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an action in ejectment. The complaint is in the usual form, alleging ownership and right to possession of the land described in the complaint to be in plaintiff and the withholding without right by the defendant.

The land sought to be recovered consists of a portion of a lot about eight feet in width by one hundred feet in depth, located in the Barman tract in the city and county of San Francisco. The defendant is the owner of the lot immediately adjoining the land of plaintiff on the north, his dwelling-house abutting on the northerly line of plaintiff’s land. Before this dwelling-house was erected defendant’s predecessor in interest caused defendant’s lot to be surveyed by the then city and county surveyor, and the house was erected within the lines delineated and marked by said surveyor, where it has continuously stood for the past twenty years. This litigation is the result of the mistaken boundary line established by said surveyor between these coterminous land owners.

Among other defenses, defendant pleaded the statute of limitations, claiming an acquiescence in the line so established and an actual possession of the land thereunder beyond a period sufficient to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.