Hing

People v. Chew Hing

Good Law
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 583·61 Cal. App. 801·215 P. 412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 23, 1923Crim. No. 660.California341 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hart, J.

The defendant was informed against by the district attorney of the county of San Joaquin for the crime of violating the so-called Medical Practice Act, in that on or about the nineteenth day of May, 1922, and before the filing of the information, in the city of Stockton, county of San Joaquin, he did willfully and unlawfully practice and attempt to practice and advertise and hold himself out as practicing a system or mode of treating the sick and afflicted, without having at the time of so doing “a valid, unrevoked certificate from the State Board of Medical Examiners of the State of California,” as provided in said act (Stats. 1913, p. 722).

At the time fixed for his arraignment, and when the case was called for that purpose, his counsel moved to dismiss the information on the ground that the superior court was without jurisdiction of the offense charged therein, the contention being that jurisdiction of said offense was exclusively in the police court of the city of Stockton. The court made an order granting the motion of dismissal and the appeal is by the people from said order.

The specific ground upon which the motion was granted was that under the statute of 1885 (Stats.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.