Siller

Siller v. Dunn

Good Law
103 Cal. App. 154·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 882·284 P. 232
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 1930Docket No. 3854.California2,553 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

Plaintiff began this action to recover from the defendants certain sums set out in the complaint as the respective liabilities of the defendants as stockholders of Dunn-Brett Furniture Company, a corporation, on account of an alleged indebtedness of said corporation based upon the provisions contained in a lease of real property, entered into between the plaintiff and the Dunn-Brett Furniture Company on or about the eighth day of March, 1926. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony the court granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, and from the judgment entered thereon the plaintiff appeals.

The portion of the lease relied upon by the plaintiff for a recovery is in the words following: “In the event of the lessee surrendering the said demised premises prior to the expiration of the term of this lease, responsibility for the payment of the rental herein provided shall continue until such time as the lessor shall have effected a rerental of the said premises satisfactory to him.’’ Notwithstanding this provision in the lease, it is the contention on the part of the defendants that the testimony of the plaintiff established beyond question that by his own acts he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.