Estate of Barnett

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 663·97 Cal. App. 138·275 P. 453
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1929Docket No. 6555.California1,987 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Two appeals are taken jointly from orders of the superior court sitting in probate in the manner of the settlement of the annual account of the trustee under the will of Melaneton Barnett.

The appellants are beneficiaries under the trust who objected to the settlement of the account upon the ground that a new trustee was substituted for the one named by the testator without their approval or consent. The respondent is a national banking association which, by numerous conveyances, has succeeded to all the business of the original trustee. These sales were all made with the approval of the state superintendent of banks and were in strict compliance with the California State Bank Act. No objection was made by the beneficiaries to any item of the account, but they urged that the settlement be denied and that the account be stricken from the files upon the theory that the provisions of the State Bank Act (Stats. 1909, p. 87, and amendments thereto), relating to such transfers are void.

Sections 31, 31a, and 31b of this act provide for the transfer of the business of banking corporations by sale, by consolidation and by merger. Each section makes special provision for the transfer of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.